Close
banner
Spine Care
Health Vision
Back Surgery Can Quickly Relieve Pain
But waiting won't hurt your chances of recovery, new research suggests
By Serena Gordon
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, May 30 (HealthDay News) -- Back surgery can effectively relieve pain for certain back problems faster than nonsurgical means, a new study shows.

On the other hand, waiting to see if the pain goes away on its own won't affect the outcome of surgery if you decide to have an operation later on, a second study found.

Both of the studies, published in the May 31 New England Journal of Medicine, compared surgical treatment of back and leg pain (sciatica) caused by disc herniation or a condition called lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis, which occurs when one vertebra in the back slips forward onto another.

"Not all pain -- whether back or sciatic -- can be appropriately managed with surgery, but if it is something that can be helped with surgery, like these two conditions, surgery can provide a more prompt relief of pain and return to function," said Dr. Jeffrey Spivak, director of the New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases Spine Center in New York City. He was not involved in the studies.

Another outside expert agreed. Dr. Dante Implicito, chief of spine surgery at Hackensack University Medical Center said that not all people with back pain need surgery. "Many patients are treated conservatively," he said.

An accompanying editorial in the same issue of the journal pointed out that 75 percent of people with sciatica pain see improvement in their symptoms within three months, even without surgery.

However, Implicito pointed out that conservative treatment or a wait-and-see approach isn't always practical. Some people are in so much pain, they can't function or may be in danger of losing their jobs if they can't get back to work, so they opt for surgery sooner rather than later even though they might eventually get better on their own. "These studies show that there can be tremendous improvement if patients are selected well for surgery," he said.

The first study, done in the Netherlands, included 283 people who had severe sciatica -- leg pain caused by a compressed nerve in the spine -- for at least six to 12 weeks prior to the start of the study. Half of the group was selected to undergo early surgery -- an average of 2.2 weeks into the study; while the other half was chosen to receive conservative treatment with the option of surgery at a later date. Thirty-nine percent of the conservative treatment group eventually decided to have surgery, and the average time from the start of the study to the surgery was 18.7 weeks.

The researchers found there wasn't much difference in disability between the two groups, but that those who had early surgery reported faster pain relief than the conservative treatment group.

"The time scheme of recovering was different, with a faster recovery after early surgery," said the study's lead author, Dr. Wilco Peul, a neurosurgeon at Leiden University Medical Center. "Fifty percent of patients [in the early surgery group] were recovered in 4 weeks after randomization, whereas prolonged conservative care would need 12 weeks before 50 percent were recovered."

"I would recommend to wait a little longer and delay the decision to perform surgery until three to six months after the start of leg pain. If, however, sciatica pain does not allow you to work or care for yourself or your family, early surgery remains a very good option and is safe," said Peul.

The second study included a little more than 600 people with degenerative spondylolisthesis, a condition more common in older people, and for reasons that aren't clear, black women. Half of the patients were randomly selected to undergo surgery, the majority of whom had spinal fusion, a procedure in which two vertebra are fused together.

The other half was to receive standard non-surgical care. However, many in the non-surgical group decided to have surgery, so the researchers had to adjust the study data, because the results were no longer randomized.

They found that after three months, and again at one year, people who had the surgical procedure had less pain and a greater improvement in function than those who didn't have surgery.

"These studies allow us to make better conclusions about the treatment options available for patients," said Spivak.

"Surgery is not the end answer for all pain problems, especially back pain. There have to be specific reasons to operate. In my practice, of all the surgical referrals I see, only about one in three end up getting surgery," Spivak said. But, for those with disc herniation or spondylolisthesis, these studies confirm that surgery can be an effective alternative, and that even if you wait to have surgery, "you wouldn't have lost anything in terms of your chances of doing well," he said.

Implicito emphasized that the most important thing someone with back pain can do is see a specialist with as much specific training in back problems as possible. "Back pain comes in a lot of different 'flavors', you need to be evaluated and diagnosed by a very well-trained person so you know what's relevant to your condition."

More information

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has more information on preventing back pain.

SOURCES: Wilco Peul, M.D., neurosurgeon, and head of Spine-Intervention-Prognostic Study Group, Leiden University, the Netherlands; Jeffrey Spivak, M.D., director, New York University Hospital for Joint Diseases Spine Center, New York City; Dante Implicito, M.D., chief, spine surgery, Hackensack University Medical Center, N.J.; May 31, 2007, New England Journal of Medicine
Copyright © 2007 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Health News Provided By:
HealthDay
 
Back to School Means Backpack Safety
Help protect kids from stress and strain, experts say

MONDAY, Aug. 27 (HealthDay News) -- Backpacks help kids carry schoolbooks and supplies, but they can also be harmful when overloaded and/or improperly fitted, warns the American Physical Therapy Association.

"Wearing backpacks improperly or ones that are too heavy put children at increased frisk for musculoskeletal injuries," Mary Ann Wilmarth, assistant dean and director of the transitional doctors of physical therapy degree at Northeastern University in Boston, said in a prepared statement. She's conducted a number of studies on school backpacks.

Injuries occur when children use faulty postures -- such as arching the back, bending forward, twisting, or leaning to one side -- when they're trying to manage a heavily loaded backpack. These faulty postures can cause improper spinal alignment, which hampers the functioning of spinal discs that provide shock absorption, Wilmarth explained.

Overloaded backpacks also place an extra burden on muscles and soft tissues, causing fatigue and strain that increases the risk of neck, shoulder and back injuries.

Wilmarth offered some backpack safety tips:

  • Use both straps in order to better distribute the weight of the backpack and to promote a well-aligned, symmetrical posture. Using one strap means that one side of the body has to bear most of the weight of the backpack.
  • Be careful when putting on and removing backpacks. Keep the trunk of the body stable and avoid excessive twisting.
  • The backpack should be positioned evenly in the middle of the back, near the wearer's center of gravity. The backpack should not extend below the lower back. Adjust the shoulder straps so that the child is able to put on and remove the backpack without difficulty. While the straps should not be too loose, they should be adjusted to permit free movement of the arms.
  • Keep the load at 10 percent to 15 percent or less of the child's bodyweight. Children should carry only items they require for the day. The heaviest items in the backpack should be positioned closest to the back.
  • Encourage children to be active, in order to promote better muscle strength and flexibility, which makes it easier to carry a backpack.

More information

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has more about backpack safety.

SOURCE: American Physical Therapy Association, news release, Aug. 14, 2007
Copyright © 2007 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Health News Provided By:
HealthDay
 
Even Sham Acupuncture Eases Low Back Pain
Study finds real improvements compared to standard therapy

MONDAY, Sept. 24 (HealthDay News) -- Six months of traditional Chinese or even sham acupuncture treatment appeared more effective than conventional treatment for low back pain, says a German study of almost 1,200 patients.

Traditional (verum) acupuncture involves needling of fixed points and additional points on the body to a depth of 5 to 40 millimeters, while sham acupuncture involves needling to a depth of 1 to 3 millimeters into the lower back, avoiding known pressure points.

Patients in the study were divided into three treatment groups: verum acupuncture; sham acupuncture; and conventional therapy, which consisted of medication, physical therapy and exercise.

Patient response rate (defined as a 33 percent improvement in pain or a 12 percent improvement in functional ability) was checked after six months of treatment. Response rates were: verum group, 47.6 percent; sham group, 44.2 percent; conventional group, 27.4 percent.

The findings are in the Sept. 24 issue of the journal Archives of Internal Medicine.

"The superiority of both forms of acupuncture suggests a common underlying mechanism that may act on pain generation, transmission of pain signals or processing of pain signals by the central nervous system and that is stronger than the action mechanism of conventional therapy," wrote Dr. Michael Haake, of the University of Regensburg in Bad Abbach, and his colleagues.

"Acupuncture gives physicians a promising and effective treatment option for chronic low back pain, with few adverse effects or contraindications. The improvements in all primary and secondary outcome measures (in the study) were significant and lasted long after completion of treatment," they said.

More information

The U.S. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine has more about acupuncture.

SOURCE: JAMA/Archives journals, news release, Sept. 24, 2007
Copyright © 2007 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Health News Provided By:
HealthDay
 
Narcotics Offer Only Short-Term Relief of Back Pain
Researchers also found abuse occurred in 24 percent of cases
By Kathleen Doheny
HealthDay Reporter

MONDAY, Jan. 15 (HealthDay News) -- Potent opioid drugs, such as Oxycontin and Vicodin, may help treat chronic back pain in the short term, but it's not clear the drugs help in the long run and abuse may be common, a new review has found.

"Opioids may be effective for short-term relief," said study author Dr. Bridget A. Martell. "But all studies [reviewed] were less than four months."

Martell and her colleagues did what is known as a meta-analysis, pooling the results of 38 previously published studies. "The meta-analysis does not show statistical significance that opioids work any better than placebo," she said, although "they possibly work for short-term relief."

The new report is published in the Jan. 16 issue of the Annals of Internal Medicine.

"This is the first meta-analysis to look at opioids for chronic back pain," Martell said. She conducted the study while an associate research scientist at Yale University and wrote the report while she was associate director of the Pfizer New Haven Clinical Research Unit, part of the pharmaceutical company's Global Research and Development Division.

Martell's team found that the prescription of these drugs varied by treatment settings, with the percentage of patients prescribed the drugs for chronic back pain ranging from 3 percent to 66 percent.

Prescribing them was most likely if patients went to a specialty treatment center and least common in primary-care centers.

Included in the reviewed studies were five reports that looked at "suspicious" medication-taking behaviors that would make health-care providers suspect abuse, such as ordering refills before they are needed. These behaviors occurred in up to 24 percent of cases.

Back pain is the second leading symptom seen by physicians in the United States, according to Martell. Chronic back pain is defined as discomfort lasting more than three months. It afflicts up to 19 percent of working adults, Martell wrote.

Besides narcotic medication, physicians can treat chronic back pain in other ways, using exercise, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medicines (NSAIDs), tricyclic antidepressants, acupuncture and electrical stimulation.

Based on the analysis, Martell offers this advice to patients with chronic back pain: "Consider all your options carefully, weigh the risks vs. the benefits of those options, and be sure to seek specialty care from a pain specialist."

Dr. Andrew Sherman, head of spine and musculoskeletal rehabilitation at the Spine Institute at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, agreed. "This meta-analysis suggests that significant risks do exist with the use of opioid medicines," he said. "Patients need to consult with a board-certified expert physician in pain management."

The lack of high-quality scientific studies is another important issue, Sherman said. The researchers found 2,378 studies but discarded most because they didn't meet the standards of their meta-analysis.

More information

To learn more about chronic back pain, visit the U.S. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke.

SOURCES: Bridget A. Martell, M.D., assistant clinical professor, medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, and associate director, Pfizer New Haven Clinical Research Unit, both in New Haven, Conn.; Andrew Sherman, M.D., associate professor and head, spine and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, Spine Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Fla.; Jan. 16, 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine
Copyright © 2007 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Health News Provided By:
HealthDay
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 Next > End >>

Results 10 - 13 of 13